Hyper-V Gen 2
|
2017-05-31, 18:48
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2
(2017-05-31 18:05)mcb30 Wrote:(2017-05-31 18:00)mastacontrola Wrote: Can you explain, more directly, what the repercussions of the reversions I made had on the whole process? So while not optimal, our stuff is usually used to boot into an embedded linux OS for the purposes imaging (capturing and/or deploying). From "FOG's" perspective this has limited potential problem. For those who customize their ipxe menu they would need to be made aware of the problem here. What I can say, leaving out the "return -EBUSY" is what seems to have been the "breaking" point of the problem. It doesn't make sense to me why. Any suggestions you might have so I can more appropriately and generically fix what might be causing it? The only reason I reverted those potential files is because they were side by side and the "least" effort involved to correct the problems. The only reason I had to do the second file reversion is so I could have the return -EBUSY and successfully build. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-05-25, 17:40
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mcb30 - 2017-05-26, 10:59
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-05-26, 12:23
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mcb30 - 2017-05-26, 13:38
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-05-27, 01:35
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-05-31, 18:00
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mcb30 - 2017-05-31, 18:05
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-05-31 18:48
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mhiroaki - 2017-06-08, 13:57
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-06-13, 14:45
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - NiKiZe - 2017-07-25, 16:35
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - NiKiZe - 2017-07-27, 10:58
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mcb30 - 2017-07-28, 21:32
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 - mastacontrola - 2017-07-31, 00:25
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)