| 
				
				 
					Hyper-V Gen 2
				 
			 | 
		
| 
				 
					2017-05-31, 18:48 
				 
				
Post: #8 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
				RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 
				(2017-05-31 18:05)mcb30 Wrote:(2017-05-31 18:00)mastacontrola Wrote: Can you explain, more directly, what the repercussions of the reversions I made had on the whole process? So while not optimal, our stuff is usually used to boot into an embedded linux OS for the purposes imaging (capturing and/or deploying). From "FOG's" perspective this has limited potential problem. For those who customize their ipxe menu they would need to be made aware of the problem here. What I can say, leaving out the "return -EBUSY" is what seems to have been the "breaking" point of the problem. It doesn't make sense to me why. Any suggestions you might have so I can more appropriately and generically fix what might be causing it? The only reason I reverted those potential files is because they were side by side and the "least" effort involved to correct the problems. The only reason I had to do the second file reversion is so I could have the return -EBUSY and successfully build.  | 
		|||
| 
				
	 
					« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
				 
			 | 
		
| Messages In This Thread | 
| 
 Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-05-25, 17:40 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mcb30 - 2017-05-26, 10:59 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-05-26, 12:23 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mcb30 - 2017-05-26, 13:38 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-05-27, 01:35 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-05-31, 18:00 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mcb30 - 2017-05-31, 18:05 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-05-31 18:48 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mhiroaki - 2017-06-08, 13:57 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-06-13, 14:45 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  NiKiZe - 2017-07-25, 16:35 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  NiKiZe - 2017-07-27, 10:58 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mcb30 - 2017-07-28, 21:32 
RE: Hyper-V Gen 2 -  mastacontrola - 2017-07-31, 00:25 
 | 
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help




