initramfs v. sanhook
|
2011-04-26, 19:26
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: initramfs v. sanhook
(2011-04-26 14:52)mcb30 Wrote:(2011-04-25 16:38)hsuanyeh Wrote: Do we still need to patch in an iSCSI initiator (e.g., open-iscsi), if the iSCSI target is sanhooked before booting? Has anyone done patches to those major Linux distros, such as Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE etc.? It is not very easy from a user's perspective to manually configure open-iscsi into the kernel. Fedora installer gets it done nicely, but it locks the MAC address... |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
initramfs v. sanhook - hsuanyeh - 2011-04-25, 16:38
RE: initramfs v. sanhook - mcb30 - 2011-04-26, 14:52
RE: initramfs v. sanhook - robinsmidsrod - 2011-04-26, 19:15
RE: initramfs v. sanhook - hsuanyeh - 2011-04-26 19:26
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)