Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk
|
2013-10-22, 10:02
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk
The only thing I can think of is that your web server doesn't support keep-alive or range-requests, which cause it to download the entire ISO every time it tries to access some part of it when using sanboot. But since your trying to boot WinPE, why aren't you using wimboot? There is a WinPE-specific howto here: http://ipxe.org/howto/winpe
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - ccy - 2013-10-22, 05:26
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - robinsmidsrod - 2013-10-22 10:02
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - ccy - 2013-10-23, 01:57
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - mcb30 - 2013-10-23, 15:07
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)