Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk
|
2013-10-23, 15:07
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk
(2013-10-23 01:57)ccy Wrote: Thanks. My httpd.conf KeepAlive was off. If I switch it ON, it load faster now. However, it still slower than memdisk by about 20%. I think it is due to the buffer size allocated for partial read. Yes; keepalives will make a significant speed improvement. For the fastest possible speed, you need to be using wimboot instead of attempting to SAN-boot an ISO. As a general rule, SAN-booting an ISO is almost always the wrong solution. Michael |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - ccy - 2013-10-22, 05:26
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - robinsmidsrod - 2013-10-22, 10:02
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - ccy - 2013-10-23, 01:57
RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - mcb30 - 2013-10-23 15:07
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)