Build structure and UEFI
|
2013-07-22, 02:11
(This post was last modified: 2013-07-22 02:11 by Game.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Build structure and UEFI
Hi,
Pardon me if I am wrong here, but from my understanding of UEFI, interrupt services are not supported there. Also from the ipxe code I see COM32 image format using interrupts. Don't read further if the above was wrong!! So my question is 1. Is bin-i386-efi a valid target - because again I think UEFI supports only 64 bit systems ? 2. If bin-i386-efi was valid, then it includes a lot of arch/i386/interface/syslinux code (COMBOOT and COM32), which it should not support (because of interrupts) ? Thanks for the help! |
|||
2013-07-22, 11:59
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Build structure and UEFI
(2013-07-22 02:11)Game Wrote: 1. Is bin-i386-efi a valid target - because again I think UEFI supports only 64 bit systems ? Yes, it is. There are 32-bit UEFI systems in existence, although they are rare. Quote: 2. If bin-i386-efi was valid, then it includes a lot of arch/i386/interface/syslinux code (COMBOOT and COM32), which it should not support (because of interrupts) ? The general build policy for iPXE is to compile as many files as possible in each build. This helps to avoid code rot: if a change is introduced which prevents the EFI code from compiling, then it will be noticed immediately since the EFI code is compiled even when building a standard PCBIOS target. Michael |
|||
2013-07-22, 15:10
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Build structure and UEFI
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply. But UEFI still would not support COM32? And so should not be linked? Thanks |
|||
2013-07-22, 15:11
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Build structure and UEFI | |||
2013-07-24, 12:52
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Build structure and UEFI
Game: And yes, even though everything is built on each compile, not everything is linked in all the time. arch/i386/* is not linked into any UEFI build, to my knowledge.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)