Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk

2013-10-22, 05:26

Post: #1

ccy

iPXE User

Posts: 18
Joined: 2011-Nov
Reputation: 0

Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk

I am planning to migrate mixed Syslinux + iPXE environment to pure iPXE due to chaining between Syslinux and IPXE cause lot of problem.

I have a Windows PE ISO that allow me to boot into Windows PE and perform Windows installation via network.

The pure iPXE sanboot script works but it is extremely slow:

sanboot --no-describe http://server/win7_x64.iso
goto start

Using syslinux's memdisk boot into Windows PE is very fast:

kernel syslinux.602/bios/memdisk iso
initrd http://server/win7_x64.iso
boot

Any ideas?

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - ccy - 2013-10-22 05:26

RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - robinsmidsrod - 2013-10-22, 10:02

RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - ccy - 2013-10-23, 01:57

RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - mcb30 - 2013-10-23, 15:07

RE: Using sanboot --no-describe to boot iso image is extremely slow compare to memdisk - robinsmidsrod - 2013-10-23, 10:44

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)